Soluții pentru problemele tale IT
Thunderbird stores your data in a separate location, away from the program files, called your profile folder. To move your data, copy your profile folder to the equivalent location on your destination computer.
[mai mult...]Mail-ul de serviciu foloseste un server tip POP3, deoarece server-ul tip POP3 nu stocheaza sent-urile pe server, nu putem tine o evidenta a mail-urilor trimise de pe telefonul mobil, asadar cum putem preintampina aceasta situatie pentru a pastra evidenta a mailurilor trimise?
[mai mult...]Are you worried that your iPhone apps are listening using your device’s built-in microphone? If so, it’s easy to know for sure—and to revoke microphone access if necessary—by checking a list in Settings.
In “Settings,” tap “Privacy.”
In “Privacy,” tap “Microphone.”
On the next screen, you’ll see a list of installed apps that have previously requested access to your microphone. Each app has a switch beside it. If the switch is “on” (green) then the app can access your microphone. If the switch is “off” (or greyed out), then the app cannot access your microphone.
If you’d like to remove an app’s access to your microphone, tap the switch beside it to turn it off. Likewise, if you’d like to give an app access to your microphone, turn the switch on.
When you’re done, exit “Settings” and your changes will take effect immediately.
It’s worth noting that if you’re running iOS 14 and up, you can tell when an app is using your microphone if there is an orange dot in the status bar in the top right corner of your iPhone screen. (If you see a green dot, that means your camera is in use.)
If you ever feel that an app is using your microphone when it shouldn’t, simply visit Settings > Privacy > Microphone as detailed above and revoke the app’s access by flipping the switch beside it to “off”.
[mai mult...]You might think that switching from Facebook Messenger to old-fashioned text messages would help protect your privacy. But standard SMS text messages aren’t very private or secure. SMS is like fax—an old, outdated standard that refuses to go away.
With SMS, messages you send are not end-to-end encrypted. Your cellular provider can see the contents of messages you send and receive. Those messages are stored on your cellular provider’s systems—so, instead of a tech company like Facebook seeing your messages, your cellular provider can see your messages.
Cellular carriers store the contents of those messages for various amounts of time. Messages are often only retained for several days, but they store metadata (which number sent a message to which number, and at what time) for even longer. These records could be subject to subpoena in legal proceedings—for example, text message records are a common form of evidence in divorce cases.
Compare this to an end-to-end encrypted chat app like Signal. Signal doesn’t have the contents of your communications. Signal doesn’t even know who you’re talking to. Your conversation data is only stored on your device and the device of the person you’re talking to—that’s it. That aside, should you trust your cellular provider with your conversations? Well, back in 2019, AT&T, Sprint, and T-Mobile were all revealed to be selling customer location data to aggregators. It was used by everyone from bail bondsmen to rogue bounty hunters. (After this was reported in the news, the cellular carriers promised to stop.)
Do you want those companies to see all the contents of your personal conversations?
But SMS messages are used for security, right? There’s a reason every bank and financial institution relies on SMS messages to verify your identity—right?
Well, yes, there is a reason. But that reason isn’t because of security. It’s just that everyone has a phone number. Requiring confirmation via SMS adds some additional security. Even if SMS isn’t particularly secure, it at least ensures that an attacker has to intercept an SMS message in addition to typing in your password.
SMS messages can be intercepted. Mobile phone networks around the world are connected to each other through the Signaling System No 7 (SS7) protocol. This is how your phone can connect to a cellular network and make and receive calls, even when you’re in another country on the other side of the world. The SS7 system has been repeatedly attacked by hackers who have snooped on SMS messages or intercepted them. This is particularly useful when compromising bank accounts, for example—the attackers can snoop on the verification codes that are generally sent via SMS, use them to access bank accounts, and drain them.
This is why security professionals have recommended against using SMS for two-factor authentication. An app that generates codes on your device or a physical security key is much more bulletproof. (However, if SMS is the only option you have available, SMS is better than nothing).
Governments around the world have access to “stingrays,” devices that essentially impersonate a cellular tower. When placed near your physical location, these trick your phone into connecting to them (as your phone would connect to a normal cellular tower). The stingray device can then track your movements and see your SMS text messages—just like your cellular carrier can.
Beyond local monitoring, SMS messages can also be swept up in larger surveillance systems. According to documents released by Edward Snowden back in 2014, the NSA was, at the time, collecting over 200 million text messages a day from around the globe.
Other countries’ intelligence services also have access to stingrays and SMS-monitoring technology, so it’s clear why encrypted communication apps like Signal and Telegram are especially popular among activists living under repressive regimes. For example, Telegram and Signal are banned in Iran.
Beyond SMS, phone numbers actually have very poor security—at the carrier level. A scammer can call your cellular carrier or go into a store and impersonate you. If the scammer has enough details and can trick your carrier’s customer service representatives, they can get control over your phone number. They may have the carrier “port out” your phone number to a different cellular carrier—just as you’d do if you were switching to another cellular provider. Or, they may have the carrier issue a new SIM card tied to your phone number and deactivate your existing SIM card, removing access to your phone number.
Now the attacker would have your phone number. With that, they can get access to accounts protected by SMS-based two-factor authentication. For an individual scammer, tricking a customer service person is easier than hacking SS7, after all. This is called a “port-out scam” or “SIM swapping attack.” You can often protect your phone number by adding extra PINs and security features with your cellular provider. Check with your cellular provider to see what security features they offer to protect against port-out scams.
This has happened to quite a few people—enough that the FCC and Better Business Bureau have put out advisories warning about this scam.
The Messages app on iPhone supports both SMS and Apple’s own iMessage service. On Android, more and more Android phones are gaining support for the more modern Rich Communication Services (RCS) standard. Both are designed to silently “upgrade” text message conversations to more modern, secure ones when both people are using devices that support them. So how do they compare to SMS?
Apple’s iMessage piggy-backs on SMS in a sense, using phone numbers as identifiers. If both you and the person you want to text have iPhones and have enabled iMessage, any text you send will be sent as an iMessage instead. These are end-to-end encrypted and sent through Apple’s servers. You’ll know iMessage is being used because the messages will have blue bubbles. If you see green bubbles instead, the Messages app is using SMS instead—because you’re messaging someone without iMessage, likely a person who is an Android user.
The RCS standard being pushed for Android users—think of it as the Google/Android equivalent to Apple’s iMessage—did not support end-to-end encryption as of January 2021. As of November 2020, Google was working on adding end-to-end encryption to RCS. That means, even with that fancy new RCS system on your Android phone, your cellular carrier can still see the contents of the messages you send, just like with SMS.
Let’s quickly summarize the problems with SMS, and compare it to a secure, end-to-end encrypted chat app like Signal.
With SMS:
With Signal, for example:
We used Signal as the example here as the contrast is so stark—Signal is the most widely recommended private chat app, with always-on end-to-end encryption.
If you have an iPhone, communicating with iMessage is much more private and secure than using plain old SMS. Hopefully, Android users will one day have secure end-to-end encrypted messages built into their devices after improvements are made to RCS. Unfortunately, iMessage and RCS aren’t compatible with each other, so iPhones and Android phones will have to communicate over SMS—or switch to different chat apps that aren’t built-in.
Other chat apps are an option, too. Telegram is popular, although it doesn’t use end-to-end encryption by default. WhatsApp at least uses end-to-end encryption by default, unlike Facebook Messenger—if you trust a Facebook-operated chat app. But even Facebook Messenger is arguably more secure than SMS—you’re trusting Facebook with your messages, but at least you don’t have to worry about the problems in the ancient, creaky old SS7 protocol.
For two-factor security, it’s best to avoid SMS for really critical tasks. Unfortunately, some services will fall back to SMS authentication anyway—for convenience. There are sometimes alternatives. For example, Google offers Advanced Protection for journalists, activists, business leaders, and politicians who need maximum security for their accounts, and it requires the use of a physical security key. That said, SMS-based two-factor security is still better than nothing.
SMS is just outdated technology. It clearly was not built with privacy and security in mind, and those design decisions are still with it today. Hopefully, this will be fixed in the future. If RCS becomes more mature, gains end-to-end encryption, and is available in all Android phones—well, then all Apple would have to do is agree to make RCS compatible with iMessage in some way. Then all modern smartphones would have secure messaging that doesn’t depend on ancient protocols built-in.
For now, it’s best to avoid text messages if you’re concerned about your privacy or the security of your accounts.
[mai mult...]If perfect spelling is not your area of expertise, professional-looking emails can be something of a minefield. Nobody wants their communications to have spelling errors left in, so let Microsoft Outlook help by automatically spellchecking emails before they’re sent.
The best way to deal with spelling errors in an email is not to make them in the first place, and toward that end, Outlook can help. The Microsoft Outlook client has a setting that forces spellcheck to take place after you click the “Send” button. If no errors are found, the email is sent like normal. If a spelling error is found, Outlook gives you the option to correct it before the email is sent.
[mai mult...]Atunci când adăugați un cont Gmail la Outlook, vi se solicită un nume de utilizator și o parolă. Vi se solicită apoi să selectați Allow pentru Microsoft Apps & Services. După ce alegeți Permiteți primiți următoarea eroare:
“Ne pare rău, nu v-am putut conecta la Google-IMAP. Încercați din nou mai târziu.”
